NAB
Captioning on-screen content is fast
becoming the standard on TV but many in deaf and hard of hearing communities
continue to call on all film screenings to include permanent, burned-in open
captions.
article here
In a Los Angeles Times article, “Captions took over TV. Why can’t they win the
silver screen?“ Sonja Sharp states that despite
roughly half of all TV viewers use captions most or all of the time regardless
of whether they are hearing impaired, captioning at theatrical screenings in
the US is patchwork at best.
The term “open captions” refers to
dialogue and audio description projected like subtitles on the screen. All
theaters must provide subtitles in accordance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Advocates however prefer open captions for film screenings
due to their more inclusive user experience. Open captions are permanently
fixed and timed to a film, they can’t be turned ‘off’ and the universality of
their inclusion would remove what some see as the stigma of having to have
their needs addressed as ‘special’ in cinemas.
Movie theaters are also required to
provide and maintain closed captioning and audio description equipment for
digital films that are produced with accessibility features.
“These devices convey captioning to the individual
user on the false premise that the rest of the audience do not want to be
‘bothered’ by captioning,” Howard Rosenblum, CEO of the National Association of
the Deaf, told Chase DiBenedetto at Mashable. “In other words, the deaf and hard of hearing
patron has to endure discomfort of these goggles or contraptions for the
presumed comfort of everyone else.”
The National Association of the Deaf (NAD) states that the two types of captioning equipment available in theaters are Sony Entertainment Access Glasses and CaptiView. Additionally, theaters are required to provide notice to the public about the availability of accessibility features and ensure that staff is available to assist patrons with equipment.
But getting open captions in theaters
is far more complicated than it should be both from a logistical and technical
point of view, advocates say.
“You’re looking up and down and up and down and up
and down through the whole movie,” deaf moviegoer Dani Duran told the Los
Angeles Times. “If the captioning goes off in the middle of the movie, it’s
‘sorry, too bad, and we’ve missed 20 or 30 minutes of the movie’ before it can
be fixed.”
In 2023, Variety reported that Sundance Film Festival jurors Marles Matlin, Jeremy O. Harris, and Eliza Hittman walked out of a film screening after Matlin’s closed captioning device malfunctioned and no other captioning alternatives were available to her and other deaf and hard of hearing audience members.
Filmmaker Alison O’Daniel, who is deaf/hard of hearing, wrote in Variety,
“I am always hesitant to complain about accessibility, but I am hyper aware of
what disabled people have to deal with to gain that access. I carry a CaptiView
into a theater and feel people look over as I adjust it. I leave screenings
with a headache from looking back and forth between the device and the screen.
She added, “I look forward to a time when captions are such an obvious benefit that films without captions are a part of cinema’s past, much like silent films.”
Filmmakers generally want to be accessible to the
widest audience possible but it seems they are facing technological and
procedural constraints. In the meantime, closed captions remain a way for
filmmakers and theaters to provide a compliant solution without taking a
“visible stand” on the issue, according to Matt Lauterbach, a filmmaker and
accessibility advocate who founded All
Senses Go.
Lauterbach explained to 3Playmedia that
captioning technology can be cognitively draining, straining on the eyes, and
even cause users to miss content in screenings due to the need to look back and
forth from a device to the screen.
“It’s a tough user experience,” he
said. “The device needs to be set to the proper theatre. You might get a
caption device set to theater 7, and it’s set to theater 6. You then need to
bring it back to get it fixed [during the movie].”
On top of incorrect theater settings,
dead batteries and uncharged devices are a common issue, not to mention theater
and festival staff who aren’t trained on how to use or troubleshoot captioning
devices.
There are open-caption screenings but
they are far from universal and you have to know where to look.
“You can’t schedule the open-caption slot at a lousy time, not promote it and then complain community members aren’t coming,” Melissa Greenlee, founder of Deaf Friendly Consulting, said to the Los Angeles Times. “To not give us options during prime-time weekends … is like saying: ‘You don’t matter.’”
ASL is even rare in theaters and on
streaming services.
The cost of creating an
open-captioned print is cited as a barrier, but Lauterbach said that the
Digital Cinema Package (DCP) can actually be formatted as both closed and open
captions without a need for additional quality control or much of a difference
in overall cost. When a captioner creates a DCP caption file, it’s a matter of
toggling settings on and off via the DCP.
In addition, because open captions
are part of a video, they are supported by all video players and devices. Open
captions eliminate rendering inconsistencies across different video players and
devices.
Many accessibility advocates say that the cost of not including a major group of people is greater than the cost of adding open captions or subtitles to film screenings because of the enormous segment of consumers being excluded, Salon’s Alison Stine reports.
United States Deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing loss communities consist of more than 30 million people. Plus, millions of non-native English speakers, neurodivergent audiences, and viewers who prefer media with captions turned on make up additional viewing groups who have helped fuel the unprecedented usage of captions in recent years.
“Ask deaf and hard of hearing people who use closed
captioning at movie theaters and you will get many stories from them about
malfunctions, battery problems, disconnects, missing dialogue lines, mix-ups of
captioning from the wrong movie, limited quantities of the devices, physical
discomfort with goggles, difficulties keeping the cupholder contraption in the
line of sight, staff errors, and much more,” Rosenblum explained to Mashable.
“By contrast, open captioning provides deaf and hard of hearing people with
truly equal access in that they can go into the theater and watch a movie
without any extra effort or having to secure any equipment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment