Streaming Media
article here
By 2030, the value of global sports rights will reach $78bn, up 20% from 2025, predicts Ampere Analysis, as global streamers switch to making live sports a major strategic play. There’s a parallel pivot from rights owners looking to embrace digital and streaming channels to reach new and younger audiences. The deeper pockets of billionaire backed streamers or those owned by tech giants does not go unnoticed by leagues and federations looking to bring yet more cash into their game.
In the US, spend on sports rights in 2025 totalled $30.5bn (per Ampere figures) with almost two thirds of that generated by long term TV deals from major leagues but the switch is gradually being flipped to carriage on global streaming platforms. In its report, S&P attributed increased competition from streamers to helping double the value of America’s streaming sports media rights from to nearly $30bn in 2024.
Netflix $5bn ten year coverage of the WWE began in January with 300 hours of content streamed in the first half of 2025. Ampere charted its impact noting that WWE Raw episodes generated 88.6 million total aggregated views, “helping reduce churn and even grow Netflix US subscriber base, despite what is often seen as a saturated market.”
It may be that in the next tranche of major league rights (from 2030 onwards, though they may be negotiated sooner) distribution on linear TV falls away almost entirely replaced by streaming services. But before we herald DAZN, Netflix, Amazon Prime or Disney/ESPN as winners, there is market disruption on the horizon.
Creators changing the face of sports
For the second year running, IMG’s Digital Trends Report 2026 crowned YouTube the priority platform for the sports industry. The ability for YouTube (also Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook) to reach new audiences with new formats, drive revenue, and deliver audience analytics is the most significant trend in sports media coverage right now.
Just as broadcasters are distributing more and more of their shows on YouTube, so sports rights holders are making larger deals with the platform to carry their games live and for free, hopeful that fans will be enticed back to the mother ship. No longer just about highlights and post-match reactions, Alphabet’s platform is becoming a primary destination for live sports, especially on connected TVs.
In the US, YouTube streamed the first game of the 2025 NFL season live, exclusive and free from the Corinthians Arena in São Paulo, Brazil. The Chiefs v Chargers contest was seen by 17.3 million fans worldwide, opening the sport up to “an interactive viewing experience with creators right at the center of the experience,” according to YouTube chief business officer, Mary Ellen Coe.
In Brazil, where soccer clubs rather than leagues own the broadcast rights to top-flight matches, broadcasting has already shifted to social media. In 2022, CazéTV, a production company owned by media and marketing agency LiveMode and Brazilian streamer Casimiro, streamed live matches from Rio de Janeiro’s state league and from the FIFA World Cup Qatar on YouTube and Twitch. Last year, the FIFA Club World Cup was streamed CazéTV’s YouTube channels and Samsung TV+. Now CazéTV has gone one better and secured 2026 FIFA World Cup streaming rights for all 104 matches - for free – along with official Winter Olympics 2026 Milan and the LA Olympics 2028 in partnership with the IOC.
CazéTV promises interactive programming targeting younger fans. Similar moves are being replicated, if not yet to the same scale, in other territories as legacy media is reformed with social media and YouTube at its heart.
In the 2025 season, UK soccer fans were able to watch German Bundesliga matches on YouTube channels (Mark Goldbridge’s ‘Watchalong’ That’s Football, 1.5m subscribers; and former pro soccer player Gary Neville’s The Overlap, 1.3m subscribers) as well as on Bundesliga’s official YouTube channel (5.3m subscribers). Also in the UK, YouTuber EggChasers streamed whole live matches from the second tier of the French rugby league.
While IMG warns against “mistaking virality for value” it advises sports organisations to “balance formats, using short clips to attract attention but guiding fans toward podcasts, live streams, and storytelling that sustain engagement and emotional connection.” Sports brands “must publish high-quality, high-volume material across every platform all the time,” it emphasizes.
Younger audiences want digital, interactive, multi-screen and authentic experiences. “They want more from the way that they consume content,” Caretta Research analyst Rebecca Jackson told said in November. “They want to have multiple things on screen at the same time; they want stats; they want to be able to engage with content more actively. That’s going to be super important in terms of maintaining competitive edge.”
Production splits sports into streaming parts
In turn this means sports producers need to think like creators and adopt toolsets accordingly. In its analysis of CazeTV, UK based sports production agency WSC Sports highlights a three point plan:
1: Build interactivity into broadcasts such as chat, polls and watch parties, “that make viewers feel part of the experience rather than spectators.” 2: Generate clips, stories, and formats for every match moment “so that engagement continues beyond the live”. 3: Use AI to scale.
In its 2026 report IMG also advised live producers to use AI to streamline workflows. It added, “The brands that scale up production without sacrificing purpose or originality will dominate attention and engagement.”
We are witnessing the final breakup of the legacy broadcast model: one signal, one production, sent to everyone. When the means of transmission (streaming) is in the hands of the rights holder they can disintermediate broadcasters and go straight to fans. IP means they can also split that signal into as many streams (ISO feeds, AI voiced local language commentary, graphics and data, 9:16 video for mobile) to create new monetizable products or new ways to engage with an audience that actively wants to interact.
Paul Calleja, CEO at IP transport platform provider GlobalM, dubs this “intelligent orchestration.” He says, “You need to be able to ingest a feed once, then version, format, and distribute it in real time to multiple endpoints across the globe. That might mean a high-bitrate SRT stream to multiple broadcasters, an RTMP output for a digital only streaming app, or a HLS stream optimised for mobile users. At the same time, you might be sending a recorded version to an archive server, pushing metadata into a CMS, and distributing highlights to social media platforms with different overlays or branding.”
Josh Harrington, Commercial Strategist in the FAST & CTV space declared in a LinkedIn post, “The streaming industry is entering a new era: the age of controlled devices, locked-down delivery, and premium-rights protection. And it could be a preview of what’s coming next — especially in live sports.”
Fragmentation continues but is this really a negative?
The splintering of live sports rights and the splitting of the universal signal into its constituent parts can be seen as part of the same continuum. It depends where you stand on whether this outcome is negative or positive for consumers.
The carve-up of Uefa soccer rights in Europe is generally seen as a negative. Fans wanting to watch the full suite of matches in the UCL and other Uefa tournaments in the UK will have to subscribe to Amazon and DAZN as well as Sky Sports “which will only push users to watch streams illegally,” reckoned analyst Paolo Pescatore.
Caretta Research found the pace of deals moving from traditional broadcast and pay TV to streaming and D2C is accelerating. “Platforms like YouTube now hold more sports rights than any other single outlet in many territories, largely because of their dominance in Tier 2 and Tier 3 sports,” noted analyst Tom Morrod. “If this trajectory holds, the fragmentation and redistribution of rights will not just be a strategic choice, it will become the default model.”
BBC Sport, which retains highlights to UCL matches until 2030/31, also took the consumer’s side; “Every time a new broadcaster enters the TV rights market it usually means one thing: supporters paying more to watch live football.”
What consumers really want does not exist in the market and never will, said streaming media guru Dan Rayburn. “They want one service to go and get every piece of sports content they could possibly ever get. That is not going to happen.”
There is an opposing view which argues that fragmentation is an opportunity. “Fragmentation is one of the most commercially exciting things happening in our industry right now,” claims Calleja. “It allows federations to sell more, deliver more, and engage new types of buyers. It brings new value to each part of the production, not just the match itself.”
GlobalM has a vested interest in making this case but Calleja’s argument, in an op-ed published at SVG Europe, is persuasive. “Federations and leagues are recognising that every version of a feed, every angle, graphic overlay, and audio track can be sold to someone. This is about allowing a much wider marketplace to participate in rights buying that is no longer limited to broadcast on its own.”
For example, in-car camera feeds in motorsport will be sold separately from the main coverage; additional analytics streams will be offered to betting platforms.
“The orchestration layer has become just as important as the production layer,” he argues. “It’s no longer enough to produce the feed, you need to be able to manage it across multiple pathways, each with its own commercial rules and technical requirements.”
FuboTV/Hulu, ESPN Unlimited and Fox One launches
Early in January 2025, Disney announced it would merge sports-centric streamer FuboTV with Hulu + Live TV, a move that effectively killed off Venu Sports.
To recap: Venu was a sports-only streamer offering major league and college sports in a joint venture from Disney, Fox, and WBD, scheduled to launch by the fall of 2024. That was until FuboTV, headed by CEO David Gandler, took on the giants with a lawsuit that claimed Venu would be anti-competitive and would restrict consumer choice. The previous August, the courts had decided in favor of Fubo and while Disney could have pursued the case it decided instead to negotiate and fold Fubo into its own. It paid $220m to Fubo on top of a $145m loan to take 70% of the combined Fubo and Hulu + Live TV entity.
In September 2025, the transaction was rubber stamped by FuboTV shareholders - routine since the upside seems obvious: its execs remain in charge of operations, it grew its subs overnight to 6.2 million and gained the financial protection of a corporate behemoth.
For Disney, too the opportunity to acquire Fubo “was likely a no-brainer,” according to Forbes. “Facing challenges from well-capitalized streaming competitors like Amazon Prime Video and Netflix, the move to combine Fubo and Hulu + Live TV gives Disney a robust, sports-focused distribution vehicle that complements its existing portfolio of ESPN+, Hulu, and Disney+.”
That’s notwithstanding the go-ahead of a stand-alone ESPN streaming flagship in August. ESPN Unlimited is a DTC combining access to all ESPN linear networks and bolstered, at launch, with fresh games from the NFL Network (in exchange for which the NFL acquired a 10% stake in ESPN). The new service, which costs nearly $30 a month, will also bundle WWE events in a five year exclusive US deal from 2026.
Fox made a similar move debuting its DTC service Fox One in August offering access to all Fox channels plus live sports including the college football’s Big Ten Championship and NFL for $20/month. Both it and ESPN Unlimited had showed moderate gains after three months. Data from research firm Antenna estimates 3m sign-ups for ESPN (in addition to the 25m existing Disney subs on launch) and 2.3m for Fox One to October 2025.
Paramount+ makes waves in Europe
The tectonic plates of US studios made a seismic shift on the UK sports landscape when Paramount+, hitherto unknown to fans that side of the pond as a place to watch live sport, landed exclusive rights to Uefa Champions League matches from 2027-2030 for which it reportedly paid in excess of $1.3bn. That follows the $7.7bn paid last summer for exclusive US rights to the UFC for seven years beginning 2026.
Aside from further fragmenting the market for consumers, the strike could land a knock-out blow to TNT Sports which had held rights to the UCL since 2015-16 under its previous incarnation BT Sport.
“Losing these rights is significant for Warner-owned TNT Sports, as its UEFA club competition rights spend makes up 39% of its total UK sports rights outlay and the competitions are a key subscription driver, alongside its package of one game a week in the English Premier League (EPL),” noted Ampere’s Danni Moore.
“No dressing this up, a disastrous outcome as [TNT] will lose the Crown Jewels in its sports portfolio,” added media analyst Paolo Pescatore. “While it saves much-needed cash, it could lead to its demise.”
Suggesting that Paramount+ had “clearly overpaid” to secure the UCL, “as part of a strategy to build a base quickly” Pescatore said, “TNT Sports will lose subscribers as sports are a big draw and drive subscriptions. For users, this is terrible, forcing them to sign up to another relatively unknown provider who relies solely on streaming (as things stand).”
That’s an important caveat since Paramount could broadcast UCL matches on UK linear Channel 5 which it owns (it does similar on CBS with the UCL rights it already owns in the US).
While Warner Bros retains TNT Sports in the US as part of its global networks division of cable channels, Netflix will gain control of TNT International including TNT Sports UK & Ireland and therefore rights to Premier League and UCL (for the rest of this season only). Netflix will likely use its increased scale to take a bigger stake in live sports which is one of the premium content areas in which it doesn't currently have a huge stake.
Apple roars into F1
F1: The Movie was one of the box office hits of the year generating $630m in global receipts while serving as invaluable promotion for the motorsport in growing reach in the US and for Apple (hardware and streamer) which produced the film in partnership with governing body FIA.
It seems likely that greenlighting the movie’s production ran in parallel to discussions at Apple about targeting live rights, which it did by locking out incumbent ESPN and everyone else from the US market for five years. That begins next season when Cadillac joins the grid.
The $750m Apple will pay F1 owner Liberty Media in that time will see all Grands Prix available as part of an Apple TV subscription (though it may air some races for free to help platform and motorsport extend reach).
The deal adds to Apple’s existing US sports rights for MLB and MLS. According to Ampere data, fewer than half of F1 followers in the US are also fans of the MLB and only 18% also follow the MLS. With over two-thirds of US F1 fans (approximately 2.8m) not already with Apple TV, there’s a pool of F1 fans ready to be lapped up.
DAZN cements relationship with Saudi and FIFA
DAZN accounted for one third ($4.1bn) of all spend by streaming services on sports in 2025 and with the London headquartered company minority owned by Saudia Arabia since February (majority owned by billionaire Leonard Blavatnik) the self-proclaimed ‘Netflix of Sport’ shows no sign of running out of cash.
The streamer’s most high profile carriage was the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup for which it $1bn. Hosted in 11 US cities between June and July and won by British club Chelsea, the 63 matches of the inaugural tournament were viewed by an estimated 2.7 billion fans across all forms of media, according to Nielsen. As the exclusive global broadcaster, DAZN also sublicensed broadcast rights to more than 100 partners worldwide. While the linear figures “show impressive results” according to FIFA (in Brazil, for example, more than 131 million or 62% of the population watched the tournament on TV Globo) the soccer body was coy about figures for streaming.
It states that DAZN’s social channels received over ten billion impressions but ratings for streaming coverage in Europe are undisclosed, perhaps limited because of the time difference which saw matches played in Europe’s early morning.
This will not dampen a likely rerun in 2029 not least because of the relationship between FIFA, Saudi Arabia and DAZN. The $1bn investment by Surj Sports Investment, part of KSA’s sovereign wealth fund, is aimed to make DAZN the official platform to showcase Saudi sport and Saudi-based events to the world. The stake represents about 5% of DAZN value even though the company has yet to turn a profit and lost nearly $1bn in the last financial year.
Saudi Arabia has invested heavily in sport and games (including the $55bn buyout of EA) to help diversify its economy, soften its image and attract tourists. KSA also hosts the FIFA World Cup for national teams in 2034.
For Netflix, sport is lifestyle programming
From being sports adjunct with docu-series like The Last Dance and Full Swing, Netflix now considers the live event as essential to its content strategy. Yet it still does so with a left of centre approach which looks to fuse entertainment and sports into new formats to entice new audiences. The clear example are its one-off boxing extravaganzas featuring YouTuber Jake Paul. His bout with aging Mike Tyson in November 2024 drew 108 million viewers, according to Netflix. By comparison Paul’s December 2025 knockout by Anthony Joshua was seen by 33 million. Arguably a more significant boxing event for Netflix was September’s fight between Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford in Las Vegas, watched by 41.5 million viewers, which “signalled a shift from ‘celebrity boxing’ to the crown jewels of the sport,” reckoned The Telegraph.
As significant was the inclusion of these fights for ‘free’ within Netflix’ standard with ads subscription effectively “breaking the paywall that has stifled boxing’s growth for decades.” This holds true for NFL games like Cowboys vs Commanders and Lions vs Vikings on Christmas Day. Its goal is not to be a boxing promoter (like DAZN) “but a global stadium,” writes The Telegraph. “They want you to stay for the NFL and WWE, but use boxing spectacles to stop viewers from hitting the cancel button.”
However, even Netflix couldn’t present a seamless streaming experience. After reports of buffering during the Paul-Tyson bout, some viewers of Paul v AJ vented their frustration at audio sync issues. One commented online: “Sorry Netflix but leave live stuff to the professionals, can’t even get the audio and mouth movement the same… #netflix.”