IBC
In a world where production capability is ubiquitous and content costs nothing, creative vision is the only thing that matters, according to VFX pioneer and Hollywood consultant Barbara Ford Grant.
article here
Barbara Ford Grant hasn’t wavered in her belief since making
an experimental short film from scratch using AI tools a year ago.
“You don’t prompt your way into a movie,” she says. “You
build workflows and pipelines. You layer AI into existing processes. What
worries me most is that there’s still not enough understanding of how much AI
is already integrated into everything we do.”
A creative technologist who began her career as a digital
artist before leading award-winning teams, and projects including Game of
Thrones, Alice in Wonderland, and Shrek, Ford Grant is a pioneering technologist
and creative executive whose advise is sought across Hollywood.
“When I entered the industry, computer graphics were the
disruptive technology,” she says. “People were worried then because it
displaced old methods — though many still exist, like stop motion and
miniatures. But what CGI really unlocked was new storytelling. You couldn’t
have made Toy Story, Jurassic Park, or Avatar before CGI. That’s
what I hope we see again — entirely new forms of storytelling.”
Movie studios would like to do things better, faster and
cheaper - or at least two of the three. Ford
Grant only sees a race toward faster and cheaper. “I’m not seeing enough focus
on using these tools to make content more interesting, to truly empower talent or
push culture forward.”
Currently a consultant to Paramount and board member of
Sohonet, Grant has been an AI technologies strategy consultant to Marvel
Studios and held key executive leadership roles at HBO, DreamWorks Animation,
Sony Pictures Imageworks, Digital Domain and Walt Disney Studios. She was the
first woman chair of the Academy’s 95-year-old Scientific and Technical Awards
Committee (2018-2024) and is a member of both the Television Academy and the
Motion Picture Academy.
“It’s pretty clear that the technical difficulty to produce
content - moving images, convincing sound, plausible narratives - is
evaporating fast,” she says. “What took weeks can now take minutes. What cost
thousands can now cost tens. The industrial complex approach to production,
which has been the gatekeeper for determining who gets a seat at the table for
many decades, is dissolving. But you cannot train a model on vision and
judgement that takes a lifetime to develop.”
This creates an interesting paradox that she believes will
define the next era of filmmaking, “As content floods every available channel,
the scarcity shifts entirely to the human capacities that determine whether any
of it is worth watching.”
The power of creativity
On the plus side, the power of creativity has always been
with artists. “The possibilities have never been greater for them to push
limits. I would be surprised if studios don’t see enabling artists as morally
imperative — and also strategically necessary. Not doing so would be an existential
threat because others will step in.”
However, she urges artists to step up and let AI in. “Different
parts of the ecosystem have different points of view about AI. Studios have one
perspective. Artists have another. Early adopters have their own. It’s not even
just about where you sit — it’s about how you visualise the role of these
tools.
“Particularly on the artist side, there’s this notion of
choosing to resist, or virtue signalling that they’re not participating,” she
says. “But the fact is, AI is already embedded in how people consume
entertainment, how content is marketed, how studios plan a ten-year slate or
pipeline.
“I don’t think creatives should be forced to use AI but it
already exists within the infrastructure, and that’s only growing. There are
people who aren’t negotiating labour deals or representing unions, who are
fully embracing these tools. They see this as a watershed moment — access to
capabilities they didn’t have before. And they’re going to move at rapid speed,
regardless of what legacy institutions do.”
One AI battle after another
In the U.S, actor’s union SAG AFTRA is renegotiating a new
deal with the studios less than three years after the strikes that brought production
to a halt.
GenAI was a hot topic then and is among the union’s
priorities now. In the interim, studios have advanced their AI strategies
including training models on in-house content libraries and promoting
executives with an AI-first brief.
Lionsgate, for instance, tied the knot with AI firm Runway
to develop ‘capital-efficient
content creation opportunities’ and recently hired its first chief AI
officer Kathleen Grace. She joined from Vermillio, a platform that helped content
owners and talent track, authenticate and monetise the use of their work in AI
models.
Disney recently inked a $1bn licensing deal with OpenAI allowing
users to make content with Disney characters. Its new CEO Josh D’Amaro has
vowed to integrate AI into production workflows, albeit doubling down on artist
creativity as the company’s strongest selling point.
“After the last strike, a lot of people left the industry
and won’t return,” says Ford Grant who is not involved in negotiations. “Some
of that work isn’t coming back. Arguably YouTube was the only winner.
“I hope that unions think strategically about their future
role in entertainment, rather than trying to claw back leverage that may no
longer exist. They need to understand what AI is, where it’s going, what they
can control, and what value they uniquely offer.”
Practical lessons in AI
With the 2023 strikes, Ford Grant found herself with extra time and decided to
make a short film to explore the possibilities and limitations of AI
filmmaking.
“I’d been working on machine learning R&D for about 15
years, but once generative video tools like Midjourney came out, I wanted to
play around with them unencumbered by the studio system.”
Under the banner of BFG Productions, she developed, wrote
and produced a 22-minute film, Unhoused, on a shoestring
$40,000 budget. The majority of that was used to shoot the production
traditionally with real actors on location with a union crew.
“Humans are still the best performers. You’ll still shoot
practical photography. But if you want to accelerate how you blend that footage
with generative content — matching colour, lensing, camera movement — what does
that workflow look like? That’s what I’ve focused on.”
She incorporated different models into different parts of the
process, including writing software to connect practical production with
generative compositing.
“Foundation models are stabilising. What matters now is what
you build on top such as LoRAs (Learnable, Reversible, and Adjustable
operations), ControlNets (which gives precise control over AI image generation)
and custom workflows. I’m also exploring tools like Cursor, Cloud, Figma —
asking what the ‘new studio’ looks like.”
The immediate future of production won’t be purely
generative. “It will be hybrid — traditional VFX combined with generative
techniques,” she says. “A lot is happening behind closed doors. AI is being
discussed everywhere. What we see
publicly right now is mostly demo material. The most promising work I’ve seen
privately involves animation and non-photorealistic character work.”
Future of cinema
She worries for that cinema could atrophy unless there’s innovation
in its production and presentation.
“Someone once said cinema risks becoming like opera; it will
still exist, but for a nostalgic, aging audience. I hope it retains enough
revenue to remain a meaningful distribution model, not something supported by
benefactors.”
Immersive multi-sensory experiences designed for venues like
Sphere or Cosm could be an salvation. Crucially, they are also communal
experiences. Cosm call it Shared Reality.
Ford Grant, who once worked at immersive art project Meow
Wolf, says connected physical-digital narrative worlds have always inspired her.
“Game of Thrones (on which she also worked) came
close with its world-building across series, podcasts, VR and live activations.
The next step is connecting those experiences in real time across locations.
Imagine being in Cosm in Los Angeles and feeling connected to someone
experiencing it in Barcelona. We’re not fully there yet technologically. But
it’s coming.”
As keyed into technology as she is, Ford Grant maintains
that storytelling is nothing without human taste and judgement and it is this
curation which she sees as the most rewarding role for creatives.
“Creativity is the accumulated judgment that comes from
years of sitting in the back of screenings watching how people respond,
understanding why one cut lands emotionally and another dies, recognising when
something is technically correct but spiritually dead on arrival.”
Take the craft of the cinematographer. AI tools might help
them test 30 filters instantly, emulate different lenses and explore visual
ideas rapidly but it is their trained eye for an image in service of the story
which should stand them in good stead in the era of instant image making.
“The individual impulse for an aesthetic and a sensibility is
something that a model can’t predict. Then there’s the alchemy of the group.
Filmmaking is a team sport in which each person brings expertise, instinct, and
reaction to the material and the world around them. That creative mix is hard
to program.
That’s why I’m excited that the playing field is levelling
in a way that has the potential to reward the very thing we've always valued
most - the quality of the idea, the depth of the vision, the truth of the
telling. Not who has the biggest budget or the most expensive equipment, but
who has something genuine to say and knows how to say it.”
ends
No comments:
Post a Comment