IBC
Michael Mann’s new film contrasts the frenetic action of racing sports cars with the more formal staging of Enzo Ferrari’s interpersonal rivalries and driving ambition.
article here
Just as the template for Days of Thunder was Top
Gun so Ferrari borrows camerawork straight out of Top Gun:
Maverick though these two films are worlds apart in all other respects.
Michael Mann’s new film is a period drama about motorsport
mastermind Enzo Ferrari’s determination to win the automotive business race
while pushing his test drivers to the limit.
“We were going to be driving these cars extremely fast over
kilometres of country so we needed cameras that would be lightweight and robust
enough,” explains director of photography Erik Messerschmidt ASC of the film’s
signature racing scenes which included restaging the 1,500km motorsport
endurance race Mille Miglia.
“DoP Carmen Miranda
is a great friend of mine and he had used the Sony Venice very successfully on Top
Gun: Maverick. We weren’t going to use green screen either. Micheal wanted
the cars to approximate teh speeds that the drivers used to drive them.”
As on Top Gun: Maverick, Messerschmidt used
the Venice in Rialto mode where the lens block is separated from the camera.
The cars had mounts built-in to the tubular chassis so that they could quickly fit
6-9 cameras on board variously on the hood, wheel rims, bumpers and passenger
seat.
“These cameras weren’t suctioned to the car they were bolted
rigid to the frame. Even with that in mind a 25lb camera outside a body panel
would significantly change the handling of the car for the stunt team, or we
wanted to get the cars really close to each while cameras hanging off the side,
so weight and space was a huge issue.”
That wasn’t the only reason to choose the Venice. He also
wanted a camera with internal ND filters. “That with something I desperately
felt I needed because we were going to have situations shooting multiple
cameras simultaneously day or night as these cars raced and I didn’t want to
slow Michael down with filtration changes. I could keep the iris where I wanted
it without disturbing the actors. That was the initial reason why Venice was
chosen.”
As the cars sped around the countryside in Northern Italy,
Messerschmidt was able to monitor the feeds live via long range transmission
from antennas to a video village arranged by engineers from US firm RF Films.
For the racing sequences he deployed a number of zooms
“compressing the space” to accentuate the feeling of speed and the tight
geography of the cockpit and corners.
“What was important to Michael in the race scene was to get
across what it felt like to be in these machines. He wanted the smell of
gasoline, the grease from the engine and dust from the road, the extreme
rattling of the metal. He wasn’t interested in capturing the smooth running of
the cars from aerials or camera-cars running alongside. It was intended to
capture the experience of being that driver.”
Seeing red
Ferrari the brand is synonymous with the colour red but Mann
stipulated that the only time the audience see red in his film is when they the
race cars are on screen.
“There is a little bit of ox-blood wallpaper in one of the
apartments but there is no red at all other than the cars, a deliberate choice
that Michael wanted,” says Messerschmidt.
Away from the track action and the film’s colour palette
recalls summertime in Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna and especially Modena, famous
for being the base of sports car makers like De
Tomaso, Lamborghini, Maserati and Ferrari.
“To me it has this hay, honey yellow to it,” observes
Messerschmidt who spent time in the region on recce. “The buildings are painted
with yellow plaster and oranges and brighter earth tones so the sun will hit
the buildings and reflect off all this colourful natural light.”
Inspiration also came from study of Italian Renaissance
painters like Titian, Caravaggio and Tintoretto, though as Messerschmidt
acknowledges a 20th Century master was influential too.
[Director of photography] Gordon Willis ASC is a hero of
mine and it would be hard for me as an American to make a movie set in the
countryside of Italy without thinking about The Godfather.
“There is a kind of simplicity in terms of how Willis lit The
Godfather that was attractive to me,” he adds. “I like the idea of
distilling the environment down to just a couple of light fixtures, asking,
what is the least we can do in this room? And that also supports Michael’s
shooting style. He wants the freedom to move the camera a lot and he doesn’t
want to let lighting rigs get in the way of that. So, there’s a practical
consideration too to the support the director.”
Mann, creator of Miami Vice and director of films
such as Heat and Collateral, had spent three decades working on
this movie, during which time he made a number of research trips to Modena.
“Michael is a photographer and he has a photographic brain,”
says Messerschmidt. “He is an image maker. He took dozens of photos, he has
files and files of historical records and newsreel footage and stills of Enzo
Ferrari. It was an incredible assortment of media. I would go into his office
and he’d show me what he wanted the movie to be. He had a very clear idea.”
One of those ideas was to use a probe lens called the Skater
Scope in order to get extreme close-ups of his actors. Unlike most probe lens
systems which have an integrated lens optic the Skater is essentially a
periscope-like extension onto which the DP can mount their own lens.
Messerschmidt explains, “This pulls the lens away from the
camera body about 25cm and it changes the optics to give you quite a bit of
macro close focus. Michael likes to put the lens very close to the actor. We
put it on Steadicam occasionally and it meant you could put the lens to
someone’s eyeball but the operator is at arm’s length away. We could fly around
Adam [Driver] or get the lens right behind someone’s ear or into someone’s
face. It’s a very unique, specific look.”
It complicated work for the DP because the lens is slow
(losing two stops) and required lighting the sets with additional light to
compensate. “To get any resolution out of it you have to shoot around a 6.5K
and you need a relatively high speed camera,” he adds.
Most of the film is lensed using Panavision Panaspeeds, the
same set that the DP had used to shoot the period war film Devotion in
2022.
“I love modern lenses because I like them to be consistent.
I am not someone who is necessarily attracted to the idea of vintage lenses. It
is hard when you change lenses and it requires a different f-stop or one lens
exhibits a pink hue and the next is green. Even though you can fix it, it
drives me nuts. I am definitely in the camp which appreciates modern
lenses. Sometimes sharpness is an issue,
but it’s nice to start at that point.
On Devotion, Dan Sasaki [Panavision’s lens scientist] had
detuned the Panaspeeds so they exhibited “aggressive spherical aberration with
halation in the highlights,” he recalls. “I really loved it and so we did the
same on Ferrari.”
Red cameras, the Komodo and V-Raptor are also used for
sequences shot in actual vintage cars, such as the open wheel car shots in the
film’s beginning, where even the Rialto was too big to fit.
The DP’s favourite shot is not though from the track but a
quieter moment in which Ferrari’s wife Laura (Penelope Cruz) holds him
accountable for his actions.
“She is stately and centred and starts the scene sitting.
Then Enzo comes in and orbits her and walks away. She is very strong in the
scene, static. We lit her with a very simple top light. The way that Michael
staged that scene with Penelope’s performance and Adam moving in and out of the
light is my favourite shot.”
No comments:
Post a Comment