Innavate
article here
The IPMX standard was created with the purpose of ensuring interoperability for video-over-IP systems.
Discussion of standards can send even the most ardent engineer to sleep. They’re an acronym soup which often succeed in masking the merits of the technology they seek to promote. And, of course, the AV industry is no stranger to a standard. There are dozens of them, usually proprietary, which seem designed to confuse the lay person and ultimately hinder rather than help installers. The fragmentary nature of the AV standards landscape has arguably held back the market from truly fulfilling its potential to connect technology with physical space and with content.
It’s why there’s hope that a new standard for
transporting audio and video signals over internet networks can finally be the
one to rule them all. In a nutshell, IPMX (Internet Protocol Media Experience)
is a set of open standard-based protocols designed to ensure interoperability
for video-over-IP systems in the media, entertainment, and pro-AV industries.
Crucially, it does not arrive out of nowhere. IPMX
is based on the AV-over-IP standard ST 2110 ratified by SMPTE which has been
pretty successful in unifying the once heavily proprietary broadcast equipment
sector. Earlier this year, the Video Services Forum (VSF) published the initial
drafts of its suite of Technical Recommendations (called TR-10) for IPMX. Using
ST 2110 as a starting point, the VSF added elements applicable to the pro-AV
and live production market. Both ST 2110 and IPMX are created and guided by the
Alliance for IP Media Solutions (AIMS) a non-profit industry consortium of
broadcast and pro-AV engineers, technologists, vendors and business execs.
The aim is to move broadcast and media companies
(broadly speaking, the professional video communications industry) from legacy
proprietary hardwarebased systems to a more cost efficient and future-proofed
internet-based environment. Rob Moodey, manager, strategic partnerships, Matrox
Video describes IPMX as “the future of IP video” asserting, “The industry
recognises the value of this new standard for AV production.” He continues: “It
bridges networks of different bandwidths and acts as a gateway between technologies
like HDBaseT, Dante, and NDI. It supports modern formats and gives users
flexibility and choice, and a way out of the ‘proprietary’ trap.”
But what exactly is IPMX, and what impact is it
likely to have on the ProAV industry? First, let’s tie-down the basic technical
specifications of IPMX. IPMX can work on 1 Gbps to 100 Gbps networks and
beyond, including wireless. This is made possible by the support of a standard
compression scheme which enables ultra-low latency while maintaining quality.
It can also support full uncompressed quality, making it ideal for live venues
and stadiums where top quality is vital, as well as codecs including JPEG-XS.
It can transport any resolution, including 8K and beyond, in 4:2:2 or 4:4:4
10-bit colour.
To keep up with the everchanging security
landscape, IPMX has a growing security solution and supports HDCP 2.x for
protected content support, which is essential in many pro-AV workflows.
Standard APIs enable a single control application to manage multiple vendors’
equipment, while HDMI and source discovery interface EDID (extended display
identification data) support allows for automatic display set-up and resolution
support. “This set of open standards and specifications allows the command and
control of AV content over an IP network – like taking the functionality of
HDBaseT and extending it right across the network,” explains Moodey. “It’s the
kind of standard that encourages people to build bridges, not fences. It’s very
inclusive and very relaxed, so you can use any input or output format you
choose, and continue to do things in your own way if you prefer. But the more
you conform to the standard, the more benefits you get.”
ST 2110 and IPMX what’s the difference? The
critical difference between ST 2110 and IPMX lies within the user experience.
Steven Cogels, global director of business development, PlexusAV explains, “ST
2110 was designed for broadcast production workflows with very stringent rules.
IPMX adapts ST 2110 timing, latency and quality but features enhancements to
create a plugand-play solution for professional AV applications. As a result,
IPMX can be used in high-end stadium events with tight timing requirements (like
audio) and enable easy-to-use enterprise AV systems that offer a friendly user
experience.”
To reinforce that point: ST 2110 requires PTP for
precisely synchronised endpoints for instant switching between sources whereas
IPMX does not. Furthermore, IPMX adds extra AV-friendly capabilities to the
benefits of the ST 2110 standard – it enables EDID and HDCP and has a roadmap
to higher compression formats. Perhaps the key factor in favour of IPMX and why
there are strong hopes it will succeed is that it eliminates the traditional
walled gardens by removing traditional restrictions around single-vendor
solutions.
“IPMX isn’t owned or developed by a single
company,” says Cogels. “Its roadmap and design are a joined effort of bright
minds in our industry. Therefore, instead of fighting the other technologies on
the market, IPMX embraces and collaborates with them.” He acknowledges that the
industry has been in a pickle with various standards and that it will be a long
time before there’s any uniform standardisation. That’s why, he says, IPMX is
designed to complement other protocols. “Although the percentage of AV-over-IP
solutions in the market is growing fast, we are only at the tip of the iceberg.
Currently, the majority of solutions are proprietary. The goal for IPMX is not
to be the only one. Other technologies can be strong within their specific
verticals or applications. Instead, the goal is to coexist with other
technologies and bridge them in and out of IPMX networks. We've found
technology vendors are receptive and open to this, while others are more
reluctant.”
Standards tend to give users a much wider choice of
suppliers, without being locked into inflated prices, licence purchases, or
outdated feature sets. “Standardisation should lead to better security, since
it’s said that “variability leads to vulnerability’,” says Moodey. “And when
technical specifications can be taken as read, buyers can focus on those
qualities that don’t appear on the spec sheet but are ultimately more important
to the business, such as quality, usability, reliability and stability.” NDI
competitor The chief rival to IPMX’s goal is NDI (Network Device Interface)
first developed by NewTek in 2015, made publicly available, and since 2019
under the stewardship of Vizrt. “It’s not a question of which is better or
worse, it’s a question of requirements,” says Moodey. “NDI embodies a
collection of applications around a productioncentric workflow, spearheaded by
one manufacturer. IPMX represents a standards-based approach with the potential
for easier integration with diverse systems, and with a focus on routing
primarily for live distribution or monitoring to a larger scale.”
Vendors such as Plexus AV have announced gateways
between IPMX and NDI suggesting these are complementary technologies, not
alternatives. “If we are looking for differences, NDI uses only codecs designed
to suit a 1Gbps network,” says Moodey. “NDI uses 1 GB streams no matter the
network bandwidth – a larger pipe can be used to carry more 1 GB streams. IPMX
can carry multiple streams but can also use 10Gbps and 25Gbps networks to carry
better-quality video in higher bitrate streams. “IPMX devices can apply to
prevailing networks in either camp – opening the way to connection between the
different networks without media conversion to/from baseband (e.g., HDMI/SDI).”
There are currently no conversations between AIMS
and Vizrt about a more formal union of IPMX and NDI but Tonia Maffeo, head of
marketing, NDI says the company is always open to discussing initiatives that
can increase interoperability within and between ecosystems. “NDI is already
used in conjunction with other video-overIP technologies and protocols, and we
believe this will remain so,” she says. “NDI has been designed from the ground
up with three principles in mind: interoperability, high efficiency, and ease
of use. The fact that our company provides free software and has been adopted
by hundreds of independent software vendors further enhances these three
principles. It’s too early to evaluate IPMX’s performance and usability.”
Momentum builds Although she can’t divulge specific
numbers, Maffeo says several hundred ISVs and OEMs already offer NDI enabled
products, “with hundreds more gearing up to launch new products in the coming
months and into 2024.” By contrast, at InfoComm this year IPMX was shown on at
least 24 booths — ten more than at ISE 2023. “There will be more than that at
ISE 2024 and more still by InfoComm 2024 – including big names that haven’t
‘broken cover’ yet,” says Moodey.
Most of the companies working on IPMX products have
signed confidentiality agreements with VSF but Cogels indicates that multiple
companies have IPMX implementations and products in the works. “Amongst these
companies there are a good number that provide technology to OEM manufacturers,
which means that there are many more companies that are working on IPMX
projects or have it on their near-term road map. From our perspective,
enthusiasm and uptake are as high as we could have imagined or hoped for. The
speed with which the industry will adopt IPMX has more to do with when the
standard is fully complete. The core standards are in draft form and undergoing
the validation and testing, which means we will see more products touting ‘IPMX
Ready’ within the next six months.”
Already announced is Macnica’s new M2S SDK, an
interface for real-time multi-platform streaming suitable for both ST 2110 and
IPMX systems. This is debuting at IBC in a sign of how close the broadcast and
AV industries are becoming – and of how AIMS-backed IP standards are
accelerating convergence. Andrew Starks, director of product management for
Macnica, says the timing is right as the thirst for stronger interoperability
is reaching a new peak as IBC approaches. “Those who walk onto the Macnica
stand will walk away with a greater understanding of how multi-vendor,
multi-platform and even multi-gig workflows seamlessly work together when
powered through our core IP transport technologies. Our SMPTE 2110 and IPMX
solutions interact with HDMI and SDI sources, condensing entire broadcast and
production facilities.”
With the broadcast industry making a hard shift to
ST 2110 and NMOS-based systems, Cogels says IPMX makes for an easier
transition. “In many cases, an IPMX-based system would offer everything an ST
2110 system can, but with a better, more integrated user experience,” he says.
“It takes a huge burden off broadcast engineers to operate a ST 2110 based
system while helping the AV industry adopt a technology that can help grow the
industry.” Near future aims The primary goal of AIMS and its members is to ensure
that IPMX attains the same level of adoption and widespread implementation in
the pro-AV industry as ST 2110 has in broadcasting.
As the final stages of standardisation are
completed, a surge of IPMX-certified products is expected to hit the market,
marking a new era of AV-over-IP deployments. “While we started our IPMX journey
believing in the benefits of enabling crossover between the broadcast and pro
AV industries, we under appreciated the intense need to enable crossover
between live production and presentation systems within industries,” says
Starks. Enabling that kind of interoperability between vendors, workflows, and
industries is an impressive feat of engineering and design. In today's world,
it's exactly what is needed by professionals everywhere and we are excited to
bring it to reality with IPMX."
No comments:
Post a Comment