NAB
No boss, work from
home, no job interviews, and fair pay. This is the future of work, according to
some, and all because of technology referred to as decentralized autonomous
organizations, or DAOs. Sounds great! Sign me up.
article here
DAOs are part of
Web3, that opaque suite of technologies for a decentralized internet that
excites a few and bores many.
Let’s just say that
DAOs could be the way work is structured and renumerated in the future, so it’s
worth finding out little more. Especially when the gotcha with a DAO in the
workplace is that you will love it!
Let’s see. Leaning
into strategy consultant Adrien Book‘s article for European job platform
Honeypot, here’s the A-Z of the DAO.
What is a DAO?
Book rightly points
out that the tech community has a habit of making simple concepts difficult.
This needn’t be the case. In short, DAOs are how humans come together as a
group to make decisions in the digital world. They do so with the help of two
key tools.
Firstly, the rules
that govern the organization are expressed as a series of digital “if/then”
statements that are then coded directly into a blockchain, thus rendering them
both auditable and permanent.
Secondly, voting
shares are issued to stakeholders in the form of “digital governance tokens” —
also recorded on a blockchain.
Doing things this
way replaces, in theory, both the legal mumbo-jumbo of today’s organizations (because
many rules are coded) and their hierarchical nature (as everyone has a voice).
Okay let’s
continue. What does a DAO structured organization mean for me, the worker?
No More Interviews
Most DAOs are
“permissionless,” writes Book. Meaning: anyone can work on them since the DAO’s
code, smart contracts, and lists of contributors are transparently accessible
to all.
“This means that
these new digital organizations have no recruitment process. You come in and
start working on anything that you can do and that needs done. No more CVs, no
more cover letters: the bottoms up model and opt-in membership of DAOs invert
the talent sourcing model.”
In theory, this
aids a true meritocracy and should erase subconscious racism and sexism in the
workplace. We’ll see.
Work for as Many
Different Companies as You Want
Being able to work
for permissionless organizations means that contributors can work for one, two,
or twelve DAOs. The sky is the limit.
“The lack of
exclusive relationship can be daunting for some, but is something many technological
workers are thriving for. After all, corporations can discard us as they
see fit. Why should we not be able to do the same?”
Think of it as
working on a movie, as Book uses as an example. Directors, producers, actors,
production assistants, art directors, prop makers, camera operators and sound
engineers come together for a project. Once the project is done, they part ways
and go work on multiple different films. In DAOs, the same can be said of
developers, community managers, accountants, consultants, and more. And since
DAOs are often story-driven, this comparison is particularly relevant.
A Fairer Way of
Getting Paid
Working without
being asked to sounds swell, but discerning adults will wonder how one gets
paid in such a system. Indeed, most contributors will expect a reward for their
work.
Because
contributors don’t have a contract, there are no classical ways of deciding
what everyone should fairly get. Instead, many DAOs create “circles” of
contributors (the equivalent of teams). Each member of the circle is given
points and allocates them to other members of the circle over a certain period.
The higher the perceived “value” of the work done during that period, the
higher the number of points received, and the higher the financial reward.
This is
particularly interesting for a variety of reasons, finds Book. For starters, it
helps us experiment with a new definition of value within an online community.
It also incentivizes workers to work towards the mission set out by DAO
creators.
“Since rewards will
often take the form of governance tokens, contributors will keep a stake in the
organization’s well-being even after they’ve left it. Finally, it also does
away with free riders that have become prevalent in large companies’ middle
management.”
A New Way of Making
Decisions
Since DAO
contributors are often rewarded with governance tokens, these can be traded and
used as ballots to make decisions within the organization. In this system, one
token is equal to one vote. Unlike classical corporations, everyone has a vote
proportional to their stake in the project. Contributors are thus incentivized
to act as fiduciaries.
Many DAO creators
are well aware that voting, done wrong, can be a form of tyranny. Cook prefers
the principles of Sociocracy. In such a system, decisions are made through
consent from all stakeholders, which are organized in semi-autonomous circles.
This way, one team doesn’t influence the decisions of another.
The Renewed
Importance of Community Values
DAOs are often
touted at the future of all corporations, but Book believes it best to dream
smaller. Take fandoms as an example. Today, many struggle to survive and thrive
under the boot of algorithms promoting virality at any cost. But having
stakeholders become customers, owners and contributors will provide a lifeline
to these online communities, as the greatest ones (the most passionate) will be
able to attract more people in a virtuous circle. This means people creating
great niche communities can now survive and make their project evolve with
their community.
It also means, he
says that “people will be able to make a living(ish), while working on things
they are passionate about.”
A Global,
Asynchronous Way of Working
DAOs are remote by
their very nature. Anyone with an internet connection can access and work on
them. While the gig economy today is hyper-local, we’re now seeing it become
global.
“By being fully
global and remote, digital organizations allow people from all over the world
to participate. Globalization led to blue-collar workers in Western countries
having to fight for their survival. DAOs may very well impact white-collar
workers in the same way. By being asynchronous, they will also (finally) put an
end to the traditional 9-to-5.”
No Boss, Fewer
Colleagues, More Trust
DAOs may be
transparent, but they are also, counterintuitively, anonymous. This anonymity
means that workers will no longer have colleagues per say. This is both a
challenge and an opportunity.
“For a while, the
workplace became the place one could socialize in. Now that it is disappearing,
the lack of physical community and identity is worrying. This is however an
opportunity for organizations to be much more active and deliberate when it
comes to team-building. The fate of the DAO may very well depend on it.”
It’s one thing not
to know your colleagues, it’s another not to have a boss, as you can often work
on whatever you like in a DAO.
“One of the
greatest shifts in this new future of work is the increased importance of
self-management. This will be uncomfortable for many, but will undoubtedly lead
to strong personal growth.”
The use of
blockchains and smart contracts means all decisions and actions can be audited,
something few workers today are privy to in large organizations.
But linking a
crypto wallet to a DAO means that anyone and everyone can see every transaction
made with that wallet. That’s fine if the person is anonymous, but not everyone
will want to be.
Book suggests that
in the new work order creating trust between compadres will come into play.
“DAOs are for
communities to come together. A certain level of trust is necessary between
members to make it work, and people like to attach their selves to what they
like; not their avatar.”
No comments:
Post a Comment