NAB Amplify
As the media and entertainment industry pivots to streaming,
questions are being raised about the sustainability of business models weighted
with huge cost and low margin.
https://amplify.nabshow.com/articles/is-streaming-a-safe-business-bet/
Netflix has spent $17.3 billion on programming over ten
years — 45% of all content spending since 2010, according to JustWatch. It
spent two-and-a-half times more than next nearest competitor Amazon Prime Video
last year.
Another report by BMO Capital Markets predicts Netflix will
have spent $26 billion by 2028.
Yet, according to Forbes, “Netflix One Question: Is It
Losing Money Or Making Money?,” Netflix reckons it needs four years on average
to begin to make a 90% return on content. It made a net profit in 2019 of
nearly $2 billion but its content costs remain astronomic.
“While it needs to rein in content spending in the long-run
to boost cash flows, this could prove tricky, as subscriber growth could slow
(or even decline) if it doesn’t keep updating its library at the same pace,
given the competition in the streaming space,” Forbes warns.
So, it has to keep spending just to stand still. Meanwhile
Disney spent about $1 billion on original programming for Disney+ in 2020. HBO
Max reportedly invested $2 billion and Apple TV+ had a $6 billion content bill
in its first year.
Is this sustainable?
The global television industry is enjoying an unprecedented
boom, with producers across all genres — from high-end drama to quick-hit
reality TV formats — benefiting from the truckloads of cash global streamers
are pumping into the business.
According to one sales executive at French-based TV
studio Banijay, “We’re working with everyone, from [AMC Networks-owned streamers]
Acorn TV and Sundance Now to the likes of Hulu and Peacock…. We’ve also seen a
huge appetite for content on traditional linear TV in the last 12 months,
driven in part by the pandemic lockdown, and the AVOD business is exploding.”
But everyone is wondering how long this will last? As sure
as eggs is eggs bust will follow boom.
In a new report, “U.S. Media: Is Streaming a Good
Business?,” the analyst firm MoffettNathanson advised that while
investment in new content is skyrocketing, there is no guarantee revenues and
profit will follow.
The analyst argues that most U.S. television groups are
moving away from the “high-margin/low-capital model” of pay TV toward a
streaming model that offers, at least initially, “low to non-existent margins
with high capital intensity.”
In other words, domestic streaming isn’t all that much
different in terms of profit margins from low-end basic cable and premium pay
networks.
What makes a difference is international scope — something
Netflix has focused on for several years by building up content catalogues and
local production hubs in places like Korea, Spain, Brazil and India. It heeded
its own data suggesting that the North American market was likely saturated and
that growth had to come from overseas.
“Netflix’s greatest asset — and the likely Achilles’ heel of
many of their competitors — is indeed their international footprint, which
should drive incremental profit and ROIC into the future,” writes analyst
Michael Nathanson. “Absent a truly global ambition and subscriber base, we struggle
to see how many of these nascent SVOD/AVOD services will profitably scale.”
No comments:
Post a Comment