NAB Amplify
When the Academy announced its Oscars shortlist for VFX it
had pundits scrambling to make sense of one of the nominees. Out were Wonder
Woman 1984, Tom Hanks’ naval drama Greyhound and Marvel
spin-off The New Mutants. In were Tenet, Love and Monsters,
Mulan… and Welcome to Chechnya, a documentary detailing the
brutality the LGBTQ community faces at the hands of the Chechnyan
government.
https://amplify.nabshow.com/articles/face-off-welcome-to-chechnya-brings-ai-to-civil-rights-fight/
The film may not have made it to through the bake-off but
retains the distinction of being the first ever doc to be shortlisted for
consideration in this category. It’s also to the Academy’s credit that it
recognised the achievements of work a long way outside the mainstream.
In investigative reportage when the identity of subjects
need to be protected they are conventionally blurred out or appear in
silhouette. That’s even more the case here when the queer Chechens are in
danger inside and outside of the country from what has been described as ethnic
cleansing.
Filmmaker David France was all too aware of his obligations
but also wanted to preserve the emotional resonance of their experiences. So
with VFX supervisor Ryan Laney, they struck upon a ground-breaking combination
of digital face-replacement and machine-learning software to replace some of
the individuals in the film with digital stand-ins.
They’re have been a multitude of face-swapping CG in recent
blockbusters including Thanos / Josh Brolin in Avengers: Endgame but
this is journalism where the integrity of the story really matters.
Laney describes the technique as “a bit like a prosthetic
where the new face is painted over the old face, so it’s 100 percent the
original person’s motion, we’re not fabricating anything new.”
France and Laney, a VFX guru who has worked on Fight
Club, Jurassic Park III, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets and Ant-Man,
trailed several ideas including rotomation — of the kind seen in A
Scanner Darkly — to standard issue pixelated faces to asking artists
to reinterpret the faces, only to find this superimposed an artist’s impression
on the reality.
They even tried a Snapchat-like technology to put digital
glasses, masks or new noses to disguise them in some way. “What that
really wasn’t doing, though, was helping us tell this really urgent, human
story,” France and Laney tell Digital Trends.
“We kept losing the human aspect of it. It wasn’t until we
saw Ryan’s first pass on the face swap using a volunteer that we knew we had
something that would allow us to show the movie to an audience. We had promised
everyone in the film that we wouldn’t release it until they were satisfied with
their disguises and their presentation.”
France asked 22 people — mostly queer activists in New York
— to lend their faces as a physical shield to protect the people in the film.
They were filmed against green-screen from multiple angles in varied lighting
conditions with their faces subsequently mapped using machine learning over the
subjects in the film.
“While all eye and mouth movement and facial tics belong to
the original subject they are all being carried out beneath the skin of these
volunteers,” France says. “This could allow us to know their stories; it’s
still them. We see the weight on their faces. It comes through, it’s
unmanipulated, we’re picking up those expressions.”
The filmmakers also went to extraordinary lengths to capture
original footage on location in Chechnya, including over writing the cards rather
than just deleting the data in case it fell into the wrong hands.
In the U.S in postproduction “we built a secret lab that was
entirely offline, so all of our turnovers were on a hand-delivered drive that
was given to me in person. All of the transfers we did for dailies and work
reviews were all done in very encrypted fashion with passwords that weren’t
shared online.”
Every frame was scrutinized to insure nothing that could put
a subject at risk was removed. “We knew it was going to be studied on a
forensic level,” France admits.
R&D alone took the best of a year. And budgeted at just
$2.2 million the film includes 400 shots, or an hour of its 107 minutes run
time.
“That’s a big change for documentary filmmaking. There’s now
this tool for filmmakers to tell their stories in ways that haven’t been done
before, and it also provides some additional security for witnesses to tell
their stories and do it in a human way. They don’t need to be monsters in the
shadows. They can have a voice and be in the light and have their story
translated effectively and truthfully.”
No comments:
Post a Comment