copywritten for Ambient Skies
From The Ladykillers to The Sting, Catch Me If You
Can to Hustlers the art of the con is straight from the Hollywood
playback. Unfortunately, real life scams and unscrupulous partners are part of
everyday film and TV biz. The ploys range
from simple fraud to complex ID theft, but the red flags are often the same.
Criminals find weaknesses in the most powerful execs and seemingly most legally
watertight studios just as much perhaps less business savvy filmmakers. Either
way, it’s your money and your reputation and your project which is at stake if
you’re the victim of fraud.
There are ways to reduce the risk of film investments and to
spot the fraudsters before it’s too late.
Due Diligence
No contract can adequately protect you against scoundrel, as
LA-based attorney Mark Litwak puts it. Thoroughly investigate the reputation and track record of any producer
or distributor you contemplate doing business with. Even check court records to
see if the company has been sued. But as common sense as this sounds, it is not
easy to put into practice.
"You often see this shaming: 'How dare you ask for my
credentials. Forget it, I'm not going to do your film,' " says entertainment
attorney David Albert Pierce Pierce. "The legitimate lenders are never
going to be offended. In fact, they'll be glad to work with someone careful with
money." So, the advice is, don’t be intimidated by belligerence.
Don’t be panicked
An invoice needs paying and the deadline looms. Do you pay? The solution can be as simple as
picking up the phone to double-check that the invoice is legit. As The
Hollywood Reporter points out, scammers know to strike when prey are most distracted or feeling the most
rushed, which is why most offers come with a sense of urgency to make an
immediate decision.
"That's always a red flag," says Pierce.
"I've never met a legitimate lender more eager to make the loans than the
producer is to want the loan. With con men, it's like money's burning a hole in
their pocket."
Invest in a completion bond
For anyone considering investing in a film, a completion
bond is an essential safeguard. The bond is essentially insurance that
guarantees a project will be made on time and on budget. Having one should give
investors some comfort in the knowledge that if the budget is inadequate to
complete the film, they will not have to either front more money or wind up
owning an unfinished film. Instead, the bond company is financially responsible.
Don’t make handshake deals. Ever:
Litwak is blunt, “Don't ever accept oral assurances from a
producer or distributor. Obtain promises in writing.” If they promise to spend
$50K on marketing, get it in writing. If there is not enough time to draft a
long-form contract, ask for a letter reiterating the promises. Retain copies of
all correspondence, contracts and any promotional literature. If a filmmaker
makes fraudulent statements in order to induce you to invest, you will have a
much stronger case if their statements are in writing. “Filmmakers who fail to
pay attention to such legal niceties lack the professionalism needed to succeed,”
he warns.
Don’t pay
for anything upfront:
It’s the classic swindle – and is another way of saying ‘get it in writing’. Talent
‘scouts’ who stop people in shopping malls, promising stardom in exchange for
hefty portfolio and representation fees, are by now practically a scam cliche,
but the "pay-for-play" model manifests in more sophisticated forms as
well, such as so-called casting workshops that get struggling actors in front
of casting directors for a price.
Secure an arbitration clause: If you end up
in contractual disputes it’s better to attempt to sort it out in arbitration,
rather than litigation, with the winning party entitled to reimbursement of
legal fees and costs. According to Litwak arbitration is usually a quicker,
more informal, and less expensive method of resolving disputes than litigation.
The trick though is to secure a binding arbitration clause when contracting
with producers, investors, distributors. Most entertainment industry
arbitrations are conducted under the auspices of either the American
Arbitration Association (AAA) or IFTA, a
trade organization representing the interests of international distributors.
Shared risk and reward: A production partner who takes a
large fee from the production budget may financially prosper from a picture
that returns nothing to the investors. Litwak advises, it is better to back a
filmmaker willing to work for a modest wage and share in the success of the
endeavor through deferments or profit participation. Beware of investing in a
project where other parties benefit when you lose.
Set up an escrow account: An escrow—or Special
Purpose Vehicle (SPV)—is an account where investor funds are held in trust while the
producers raises the minimum necessary to make the film. SPV's are a kind of
firewall against liabilities. If a film goes way over budget, or flops badly,
the SPV goes bust, not the producer's main production company.
H2 Checks and balances: After funds are disbursed for
production, there should be a system of checks and balances to ensure that all
monies are properly spent and accounted for. A budget and cash flow schedule
should be approved beforehand. Production funds should be placed in a separate
segregated account and not mixed with the filmmaker's personal funds. What’s
more, all checks withdrawing funds from the account should be signed by two
parties.
Nothing is foolproof: Producer Jonathan Sothcott set up
an SPV and placed $180,000 of investor’s money into it to make the thriller
Assassin. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Sothcott was using the SPV as his own private piggy bank. When the film’s
director J.K. Amalou tried to check the company finances, he found Sothcott had
failed to file the required bank mandate giving him access. "The minute I
looked at the bank statement, I saw straight away that he was taking huge
amounts from the account," Amalou said. "I saw companies that had no
connection with my film whatsoever. It was obvious he was using the bank
account—my investors’ money, my film’s money — to do other
things."
Confused? concerned? Get an advisor: As we’ve
seen, filmmakers can be badly taken advantage of if they attempt to negotiate a
deal without assistance. Retain an entertainment
attorney or experienced producer’s rep to independently advise you and review
all documents. It could save your hide
in the long run.
Three of the best (or worst)
Anchor Bay Entertainment, v. BF1 Films
In 2011, producer Jeffrey Yordy was found to have created a
shell corporation, BF1 Films, with the sole purpose to defraud producers
including Anchor Bay (now subsumed under Lionsgate), out of millions of dollars
for film production that was fully financed, but never actually filmed or
delivered. According to this citation at Romero Law, Yordy
materially breached his contract by only producing only one of the five films
that he solicited monies for, forging financial documents.. and providing
further falsified documents purporting to evidence the completion of films
which had, in fact, never commenced shooting.
As recent as last year, Adam Joiner was arrested and was
charged orchestrating an elaborate fraud to convince investors to put millions
of dollars into non-existent blockbuster in Legends. He even forged documents
from companies including Netflix and Steven Spielberg’s Amblin Partners. In
this case it appears that due diligence on Joiner – with no industry track
record - was not followed.
H2 Dirty Rotten Scoundrels aka Impersonation fraud:
Consider the case of the so called ‘Con Queen’ of
Tinseltown, who duped filmmakers including Sony exec Amy Pascal and LucasFilm’s
Kathleen Kennedy. The figure, never seen, managed to persuade dozens of
filmmakers and freelancers to visit Indonesia on the pretext of a movie being
made and the promise of cash on arrival, only to trick them into parting with
hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Hollywood is a hotspot for impersonation-type frauds.
According to investigation firm K2 Intelligence, “Identity theft is becoming
more prevalent everywhere, but it’s easier to do on high-profile people,
because there’s so much information out there. It’s easier to impersonate these
people than someone who is high-net-worth but might be more private.”
The case is still live, the Con Queen remains at large.
H2 Springtime for Hitler aka Tax Fraud: In Mel
Brooks’ The Producers, empresarios Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder scheme to
oversell shares on a massive scale and produce a play that will close on
opening night, thus avoiding payouts and leaving them free to flee to Rio with
the profits. Loopholes like this are still being exploited.
For instance, filmmaker Richard Driscoll was found guilty in
2013 of conspiracy to defraud the British government by funding his film El
Dorado by filing false tax returns. Driscoll was alleged to have falsely
claimed the movie's budget to be $15 million; the figure was actually only $1.5
million. Bogus invoices were created to support the false repayment claims and
other invoices were genuine, but had their values inflated.
Mirroring the plot of Brooks’ farce, in which ‘Springtime
for Hitler’ is designed as a failsafe disaster, The Daily Telegraph
called El Dorado ‘the worst movie ever made’. It was never released.
In your article https://ambientskies.com/blog/filmmaking/identifying-fraudulent-producers-before-its-too-late/ you identify Jeff Yordy as a fraudulent producer. However, Deadline identifies Bill Yordy. https://deadline.com/2011/08/anchor-bay-sues-bf1-over-output-deal-163444/. Do you know which is correct? I ask because their appears to be a third person, another Jeff Yordy who is an Arizona (US) con man who impersonates a film producer/distributor. Are any or all of these people the Jeff Yordy of the Fox Faith movies released before the Disney merger?
ReplyDelete