Saturday 28 February 2015

Inflight Connectivity Goes Global


Cable Satellite International

Airlines are increasingly utilising high speed broadband to differentiate their service and keep pace with passenger demand at 40,000 feet.


In response to intensifying consumer demand for the content they want when they want it, airlines are increasingly employing wireless streaming and portable devices as a value service to enhance passenger experiences. These new services present an opportunity for airlines to increase consumer bases, create new revenues and reduce cost. It also presents new business for satellite bandwidth and broadband systems providers as the demand for global inflight connectivity expands outside the US.
The aeronautical mobility sector is a key target market for SES and is poised for strong growth in the coming years,” said SES' chief commercial officer Ferdinand Kayser, in tieing up a deal last September to supply satellite bandwidth to aero communications supplier Global Eagle.
The demand is clear. With 81% of passengers carrying a smartphone, and nearly 20% carrying a smartphone, a tablet and a laptop, people want to view content over their own devices, as they do on the ground. Inmarsat quotes figures that show passenger demand for inflight connectivity has increased in the past twelve months with 52% of consumers believing it an important area of investment, and 54% saying they would use their mobile device to stay in touch with the ground.
Many people dread being out of mobile phone contact,” states OnAir Aero, a provider of in-flight connectivity services. “They are used to being connected wherever they are. There is no reason why that should change just because they are flying.”
The global in-flight entertainment (IFE) segment is estimated to total more than $3 billion annually. The industry has been growing at nearly double-digit rates and is expected to expand more rapidly over the next few years. Certainly, with the number of commercial aircraft with high-speed, broadband communication links projected to quadruple to more than 13,000 by 2023, competition for eyeballs in mid-air will intensify.
Consumer demand for any content at any time on any device is changing the cost-benefit equation for airlines and high-quality, scalable, flexible video streaming solutions will play a significant role in this transition,” says Lionel Bringuier, senior product manager, Delivery Products for Elemental Technologies. “Infrastructures based on legacy hardware will not be able to keep pace. Airlines and IFE vendors need to be able to easily prepare their technology infrastructures for live linear streaming at the lowest possible total cost of ownership. That strategy starts with a continuously upgradeable video processing and delivery infrastructure that can bring premium content to viewers no matter what device they’re using or where they are.”
Increasingly, consumers expect their video anywhere, on any device and want to view that content with DVR controls like time delay, pause or repeat. They will come to expect this onboard airplanes, too. Live streaming TV – particularly time-shifted TV that ensures no passenger ever has to miss the end of their movie or show because their journey is over – presents an interesting opportunity for engaging and capturing consumers and monetising. But it also provides new technical challenges with more content protection when the passengers are 'taking the content' out of the aircraft.
On-demand TV reflects how people increasingly watch TV shows and films but there is the question of which channels to show, in which language, along with the associated licensing rights,” states OnAir. “This is less of an issue when flying only over one country (such as the US) however it is very complex when flying international routes.”
Pay models
Pay per view, pay by usage (MB), pay by duration and sponsorship are some of the different business models in play although these pay models are based around broadly two deployment models.
In one, airlines preload content and specialised in-flight apps onto tablets that are distributed in cabins, suggests Bringuier. In another model being deployed by IFE vendors, airlines install a plane-wide content streaming system with a wide variety of movies, TV shows, games, music and other content along with broader Internet access. Airlines can stream content to passengers’ devices and to wireless screens they distribute or build into seats.
For example, when upgrading entertainment options on the fleet of 757s it flies between Paris and New York in 2012, French airline OpenSkies (owned by British Airways) bought nearly 500 Apple iPads and preloaded them with videos to hand out to passengers instead of adding more seat back video systems. Outside the US, multiple airlines - such as Air France/KLM, China Southern, El Al Israel, Emirates Airlines, Jetstar Group, Lufthansa, Qatar Airways, Qantas Airways and Singapore Airlines - distribute or rent tablets to passengers and offer on-board wireless video systems that stream movies and TV shows and provide broader connectivity. In the US, carriers including American, Delta United and Southwest offer BYOD (bring your own device) streaming. Passengers connect to the airline’s onboard WiFi and stream content from its server-based onboard library.
OnAir's VOD product OnAir Play, combines inflight connectivity with films, TV, music, games, magazines and newspapers. Passengers have access to a full range of content including live news and sport, updated throughout the flight and can buy destination-based goods and services to ease their arrival. The passenger simply connects to the Wi-Fi hotspot using their own personal electronic device to access all the content. The content is also available through the embedded seat-back screens and overhead screens.
As well as pre-loaded content, OnAir Play Live is able to push content, for example news and sport, to the aircraft during the flight, giving passengers access to the latest developments. The content is tailored for each airline. For example, the news updates can come from the airline’s home country, wherever the aircraft is in the world.
Such systems can save airlines cost. According to the Wall Street Journal, the OpenSkies iPad system cost about $250k to install per plane in contrast to the $3 million per airplane that typical in-flight entertainment systems cost to wire in. An onboard wireless system could reduce hundreds of pounds without the miles of cabling required for traditional seatback systems. The WSJ reports that getting rid of screens on a single 767 Lufthansa airplane with 260 seats could save 80 metric tons of fuel a year or nearly $90,000.
Wireless systems also offer airlines future-proofing opportunities. Typical on-board seat-back entertainment systems last five to ten years and have no hope of keeping pace with rapidly shifting consumer behaviour and expectations. Airlines can keep up by opting for building less on board – including a software-upgradeable video processing enabled infrastructure.
With the current adoption rate below 10%, though, Wei Li, Senior Consultant, Euroconsult warns; “It seems providers and airlines still need to work together to find more sustainable business models in order to attract more passengers to use the service.”
Video heads the list of potential connectivity applications but is far from the from only one. For example, in the cabin it not only includes passenger connectivity but also crew communications and inventory management, crew rostering, credit card payments and telemedicine. In the cockpit, applications include connected electronic flight bags and route information as well as aircraft health monitoring. Some service suppliers (Inmarsat is one) can provide a service to cover all of these applications from cockpit to cabin.
Successful, sustainable business models will likely evolve and hybridize just as we have seen with OTT and TV Everywhere services over the past couple of years as airlines, IFE vendors, programmers and advertisers identify the monetization models,” says Bringuier.

Bandwidth provision
Air to ground (ATG) WiFi is best suited to domestic coverage, certainly over large continental landscape markets like the US and China.
It can provide High Throughput Satellite-comparable bandwidth and can leverage existing cellular infrastructure,” says Li. “However, for geographically fragmented markets, the licensing process will be very long and costly.”
The biggest driver for revenues is the demand for more bandwidth on regional routes for passenger and crew connectivity via Ku-band and HTS systems, states NSR's Commercial Mobility via Satellite, 10th Edition report published last summer. In-service Ku-band units will grow to just over 9,400 by the end of 2023, with most units on narrow-body airframes. This blistering pace is made possible by aircraft being outfitted on the production-line by the likes of Boeing and Airbus, mostly for North American carriers.
The rate of growth should see a slowdown around 2017/2018 when HTS units installs start to grow. HTS systems will start gaining marketshare in 2017 and as such, short-term gains are key for Ku-band.


Gogo, arguably the world's largest IFE brand, has satellite agreements in place with SES (for coverage over the US., Atlantic Ocean and Europe) and Intelsat for coverage over portions of the Atlantic and northern Pacific oceans, as well as routes over South America, Asia, Africa and Australia).
In the US it uses a Ku-band antenna for downlink to the plane and terrestrial ATG uplinks from the plane. Its latest technology, 2Ku, expands its reach globally, and deploys two Ku-band antennas for speeds of 70 Mbit/s. All Delta Air Lines international fleet and all of Virgin Atlantic's craft are being fitted with the solution.
Whether ATG or satellite delivered to the craft, one of the most important aspects of inflight connectivity is that it is available consistently. International airlines in particular need to be able to provide their passengers with a consistent service throughout every flight, whether they are flying over land or water, regardless of territory.
The provision of consistent global connectivity is particularly important for international airlines,” says Leo Mondale, president, Inmarsat Aviation. “SwiftBroadband (Inmarsat's IP-based, high-speed data service) is the only global L-band network, and GX Aviation will be the only global Ka-band network.”
The introduction of Inmarsat’s global Ka-band network, Global Xpress (GX), early in the second half of 2015, will be a game-changer says Mondale. For the aviation market, it will provide speeds of up to 50Mbps to the aircraft, “enabling airlines to satisfy what has now become a basic need for people, keeping them connected throughout the entire journey.”
Inmarsat is working on a European Aviation Network, operating over S-band, to cover countries within the European Union, along with a complementary ground network. It will be integrated with its L-band and Ka-band networks, allowing Mondale to claim Inmarsat will “provide airlines with the highest capacity and connectivity available.”
Last summer, in-flight network switching between six satellites and three Ku- and Ka-band networks was demonstrated by ViaSat.
The test flights validated ViaSat's 'best available service' premise, a concept that borrows from mobile cellular communications. Similar to the way a cell phone roams between 3G and 4G or LTE, satellite network-switching can benefit customers in the same way, as higher performance satellite coverage areas are introduced to new regions. The airborne broadband terminal integrated a ViaSat Ku/Ka-band antenna with ViaSat mobile and broadband modems, and a third-party modem.
ViaSat's Exede in-flight internet enable broadband satcoms on 200 commercial aircraft operating over the ViaSat high-capacity Ka-band satellite network in North America. The company has also significantly expanded its global Ku- broadband airborne network to address enroute connectivity for business aircraft. Applications include live HD TV streaming.
Most of OnAir’s 21 airline customers currently use Inmarsat SwiftBroadband, which it says provides cost-effective and consistent global coverage. It is, though, agnostic about the radio link provided the technology is available for use on aircraft.
This simple statement covers a very complex undertaking,” it states. “Inflight connectivity is subject to two areas of regulation. The first is that the airborne hardware needs certification from international and national aviation regulators. The key criteria are that it is robust enough to withstand the pressures of flying and that it does not interfere with the plane’s avionics. The second is telecoms regulatory approval for the use of the spectrum. The key objective is to ensure inflight connectivity does not interfere with ground networks.” (OnAir currently has authorizations from over 100 countries, with the list growing each month).
Since different providers use different infrastructures (and even the same provider is not able to use the same network in different regions due to the limitation of ATG or satellite coverage) quality of service is due for development.
Many passengers complain that QoS is not equal over oceans as over continents,” says Euroconsult's Li. “This will negatively affect the passenger experience and slow down growth. QoS is expected to be harmonized in the coming years as more global and multi-regional mobile satellite networks deploy. Moreover, satellite operators have started to work closer with inflight connectivity providers prior to the launch of satellites and thus more inflight purpose-made satellite beams are expected in the future.”
Outside of the US, the TV service is primarily VOD but the introduction of HTS provides more bandwidth at low per MB price to the market, making satellite more affordable to travelers and making live broadcasting an option.
The satellite industry is still trying to find a balance between the HTS spot beam and the regular larger beam for the investment of future satellites,” says Li. “It is difficult to tell what will be the usage mix between broadcast type services and data intensive point-to-point services in the next 15 years (typical life time of a satellite). In addition, the ATG is becoming increasingly competitive, especially over continents. Also for the business model, satellite industry now has a choice between providing the connectivity to passengers and providing network infrastructure to service providers. The infrastructure only model will ensure higher margin and is easier to operate. However the end to end service based model can ensure the market share.”

No comments:

Post a Comment